A Delaware Statutory Trust, or DST, is a commonly used structure for those accredited investors looking to fractionally invest in real estate.
The primary draw to investing in a DST is that it is 1031 Exchange eligible, meaning that investors who are selling a property can defer paying capital gains tax by investing those proceeds into a DST, which the IRS has ruled qualifies as a “like kind” investment.
DST offerings are normally “sponsored”, or brought to market and made available to accredited investors, by national real estate companies, and can be offered through third-party securities broker-dealers. DST sponsors acquire the property(s) to be offered within the trust. The DST sponsor will do due diligence on the property, sometimes secure long-term debt that is non-recourse to investors, and arranges all legal paperwork to ensure that the trust qualifies for 1031 exchange purposes. The DST sponsor will then make the asset(s) available to accredited investors on a fractional ownership basis, and will collect a fee for structuring, overseeing, and managing the investment on behalf of investors.
In the early 2000s, some of the nation’s largest real estate sponsors and their attorneys pushed the IRS to establish guidelines that would allow TICs, or “tenant-in-common” real estate (a co-ownership structure described in more detail below) to qualify for 1031 exchanges. As a result, investment in TICs skyrocketed. Soon, investors were confronted with some of the challenges presented by TICs, such as needing unanimous consent among investors to make certain types of decisions related to the property.
Around this same time, the concept of investing through a DST gained traction. DSTs provided more flexibility than TICs and addressed some of investors’ concerns—particularly around the unanimous consent provisions.
It was no surprise, then, that investors and sponsors urged the IRS to adopt similar 1031 exchange guidelines for DSTs. In response, in 2004, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2004-86 that allowed the use of the DST structure to acquire real estate where the beneficial interests of the trust would be treated as direct interests in replacement property for the purposes of a 1031 exchange. This was heralded as a major victory for the syndicated real estate industry.
Both TICs and DSTs were widely used up until the Great Recession in 2008. When real estate values plummeted, so did their popularity. TICs were impacted more than DSTs. Few individual investors wanted to take on the responsibility of co-owning underwater real estate with so many others. At least with DSTs, individual investors were not liable for any loan repayment – the DST sponsor was. As the economy improved, investment in real estate syndication picked back up. Today, DSTs are often considered the preferred method of fractional real estate ownership given the complexities associated with TICs.
For long-time real estate investors, DSTs are a relatively new concept. Most long-time investors are instead familiar with TICs, or tenant-in-common real estate investments. Both TICs and DSTs allow people to invest fractionally in real estate. Both can be used in conjunction with 1031 exchanges. As such, it is no wonder some people confuse TICs and DSTs. However, there are some key differences between the two.
A primary difference has to do with the level of involvement of investors. The co-owners of a TIC are usually more involved in the day-to-day management of the real estate, including property management. DSTs are truly passive investments in which the sponsor oversees the deal on investors’ behalf.
One of the reasons management of TICs can be so cumbersome is that decisions require unanimous consent of co-owners on any major decisions. In fact, this is one of the challenges that led to the creation of DSTs. The unanimous consent required by TICs was a turnoff for many investors and created challenges for some who had already invested in TICs.
Another difference between TICs and DSTs is how they hold title to the property. TIC co-owners each hold a fractional share of the title to the property. Conversely, the DST holds actual title to the real estate asset – individual investors do not. This has implications as it pertains to financing. When debt is used to finance the property, either acquisition or improvements, the individual co-owners of a TIC therefore carry liability for that debt. This also means that lenders need to underwrite each borrower individually, which can prove burdensome for most lenders and therefore, can make real estate held in TICs difficult to finance. DST investors do not carry debt directly, since the asset is held exclusively by the DST on the investors’ behalf in a trust structure.
TICs and DSTs also differ in terms of the number of investors allowed to participate. TICs are limited to 35 investors (or “co-owners”) versus DSTs which are capped at 499 individual investors.
Finally, because DSTs allow for more investors to participate, the minimum investment is generally lower than what is required by TICs. Many TICs require at least a $500,000 investment versus a DST which usually allow investments as low as $100,000 (or sometimes less).
There are two ways an investor can take advantage of the benefits DSTs offer. The first, and most popular way, is to invest using 1031-exchange funds. The other option is a direct cash investment into a DST.
1031 Exchanges
Traditionally, an investor looking to defer paying capital gains tax on the sale of a real estate asset will do a 1031 exchange and use the proceeds from the sale to invest in another “like kind” asset. There are strict rules associated with 1031 exchanges, though. For example, under current law, to qualify for a full tax deferral, investors must:
Reinvest 100% of net sales proceeds, also known as equity, into the replacement property;
Acquire an equal or greater amount of debt on the replacement property;
Identify potential replacement property(s) within 45 days of sale; and
Close on the replacement property(s) within 180 days of the sale.
Meeting these criteria can be difficult, particularly in today’s competitive real estate market.
DSTs offer an alternative to “whole property” 1031 exchanges.
Instead, investors can roll the proceeds of the sale of their property into a DST. The investor will then hold proportionally fractional ownership in the property (or properties) owned by the DST. DSTs are already established (“pre-packaged,” if you will) and ready to accept investors, which allows someone selling their property to generally move quickly in accordance with the IRS’ 1031 exchange guidelines. All due diligence on the real estate is already complete. Moreover, the proceeds from the sale of the investors’ property will qualify for the same capital gains tax deferral, under current law, as if they had invested through a whole property 1031 exchange.
Sometimes, investors will combine strategies by investing in both whole property and a DST. This is often the case when an investor finds a suitable replacement property (or properties) but still has excess cash remaining from the sale of their other asset. The investor can take the remaining sales proceeds and invest that capital into a DST to take full advantage, under current law, of the 1031 exchange benefits.
Accredited investors may also invest in DSTs without selling any real estate of their own. This is a great way for those looking to gain a toehold in passive and diversified real estate. Most DSTs have a minimum investment amount, usually $25,000, that is required for those making a direct cash investment. This is a particularly attractive option for accredited investors looking to access institutional-quality and other high-value real estate that they would be unable to afford on their own.
There are many potential benefits to investing in a DST, several of which are outlined below:
As noted above, DSTs are a great way for investors to defer paying capital gains tax on the proceeds of the sale of their other real property. Rather than doing a “whole property” 1031 exchange, they can reap the same benefits by investing in a DST. Under current law., once the DST program concludes or the asset is sold, investors can reinvest in another DST or sole-ownership property to continue deferring paying capital gains taxes in perpetuity.
The biggest limitation to those trying to conduct a traditional 1031 exchange is generally identifying a suitable like-kind property to purchase within tight IRS timelines. This is particularly true in today’s competitive real estate environment, where there are fewer “deals” to be had. Investors still need to conduct thorough due diligence on every prospective opportunity, and finding a property that meets their investment criteria within the allotted time can oftentimes be quite challenging. DSTs offer real estate that has already been thoroughly vetted and is ready for investment. This allows sellers to move quickly while still taking advantage of the tax benefits associated with doing a 1031 exchange.
Many investors seeking to do a 1031 exchange find themselves pressured into trading up into a property that they might not otherwise purchase if it were not for the 1031-time constraints. Investing in a DST provides access to greater inventory—including real estate that has been carefully vetted by some of the industry’s leading players. This can help reduce the likelihood of making a “bad” investment for those who might otherwise make a snap decision given timeline pressures.
Those who trade-up into a higher value asset with a traditional 1031 exchange still take on the burden of actively managing the real estate. Instead, those who invest the proceeds of their sale into a DST will hand over management responsibilities to the sponsor of the DST, who oversees the real estate holdings on the investors’ behalf. This allows an investor to cash out of a property they actively own and manage into real estate that is 100% passive in nature.
Unlike TICs, those who invest in DSTs are not liable for any debt associated with the property. Instead, the sponsor is solely responsible to lenders. Real estate held in DSTs is also easier to finance because the lender is only underwriting the sponsor, usually a large and reputable institutional real estate company with a verified track record, and not each individual investor, as is the case with TICs.
Those who invest in property directly are often limited to assets of a certain caliber simply due to the costs and financing associated with investing in higher-quality real estate. Those looking to invest in institutional-quality assets can do so by invest through a DST given its fractional ownership model. Through a DST, an individual investor can own a small share of a high-quality asset that would otherwise have high barriers to entry.
Diversification: There are multiple DST real estate investments available to investors from various DST sponsors, including multifamily, storage space, office, and NNN leases. And not only can you invest in a particular type of DST, such as multifamily, you can do so in several different geographic regions of the country, so that even if one area of the country was to experience a downturn in their local economy, chances are greater that other locations do not, or at least, those odds are lessened by diversification.
Not an offer to buy, nor a solicitation to sell securities. Information herein is provided for information purposes only, and should not be relied upon to make an investment decision. All investing involves risk of loss of some or all principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Speak to your finance and/or tax professional prior to investing.
Securities offered through Emerson Equity LLC Member: FINRA/ SIPC. Only available in states where Emerson Equity LLC is registered. Emerson Equity LLC is not affiliated with any other entities identified in this communication.
1031 Risk Disclosure:
We provide strategic, targeted and alternative real estate solutions to a dynamic and diverse clientele while building sustained long-term relationships over transactions, and quality over quantity.